This unit covers General treatment considerations (IV-D) and Target muscles, typical electrode placements, and SEMG treatment protocols for specific neuromuscular conditions (IV-E).
Students completing this unit will be able to discuss:
Blepharospasm involves spasm of the eyelids characterized by bilateral blinking. The responsible muscles are the orbicularis oculi that surround the eyes. Symptoms range in severity from increased blinking and periodic eyelid spasm to ocular pain, facial spasms, and disabling interference with vision. Their functional blindness may prevent normal activities that depend on vision, like driving, reading, viewing television, and walking. Anxiety, depression and suicide, inability to perform their job, and social withdrawal are common reactions (Saulny, 2005).
There are an estimated 50,000 cases of blepharospasm in the United States, with 2,000 new cases annually, and a prevalence of 5 in 100,000. This disorder is more common in women than men (1.8 to 1). Blepharospasm is first diagnosed at 56 and two-thirds of these patients are 60 or older (Saulny, 2005).
SEMG
biofeedback can be used to reduce spasticity in the
orbicularis oculi
muscles. Miniature (0.5 cm) surface electrodes are placed over these
muscles. Patients are instructed to reduce the elevated SEMG levels
associated with muscle hyperactivity. Home practice may focus on spasm
suppression using a mirror for feedback.
The orbicularis oculi muscles (shown below) are located around the eyes.
Below is a BioTrace+ / NeXus-10 screen that provides SEMG biofeedback to help clients learn to relax. This screen shows a water lily digital water ripple effect to teach SEMG relaxation. The water surface will become 'quieter' as the SEMG levels decline. This display also shows the percentage of time the client's SEMG level exceeds the training threshold.
Fecal incontinence is the involuntary
release of feces or gas due to loss of anal sphincter control. The
diverse causes of fecal incontinence include congenital abnormalities
that damage the spinal cord, and anal sphincter damage due to vaginal
delivery, surgery, inflammatory conditions, and cancer, inflammatory
bowel conditions, and medical conditions, including diabetes mellitus,
stroke, spinal cord trauma, and neurodegenerative disorders.
Nelson and colleagues (1995) reported a prevalence rate of 2.2%.
The incidence of fecal incontinence is 8 times higher in women than men.
Childbirth is the most common predisposing factor to fecal incontinence
because it may disrupt the internal or external anal sphincter, or damage
the pudendal nerve (Seymour, 2002).
When peristalsis transports fecal material from the sigmoid colon to the
rectum, pressure on the rectal wall triggers a defecation reflex. Firing
of sacral spine parasympathetic motor neurons shortens the rectum,
increasing pressure on fecal material.
The involuntary internal sphincter is
opened by increased pressure within the rectum, voluntary diaphragm and
abdominal muscle contraction, and parasympathetic stimulation.
Intentional relaxation of the voluntary external
sphincter expels feces, while constriction postpones
defecation (Seymour, 2002).
Biofeedback should only be initiated following medical evaluation and
conducted under medical supervision. Two major training procedures
include an anal EMG probe and three-balloon manometry (pressure) system.
The anal EMG probe, based on John
Perry’s vaginal Perinometer, detects muscle activity associated with the
external anal sphincter.
Continence training teaches the patient to
increase external rectal sphincter strength to prevent unwanted voiding
of feces and to develop proprioceptive cues so that signals from rectal
wall stretch receptors will contract the external rectal sphincter to
prevent leakage.
A Thought Technology Ltd. U-Control home continence trainer is shown
below.
A manometry system places one of
three balloons (Schuster anorectal probe or others) in the anal canal to
simulate movement of fecal material, adjacent to the internal rectal
sphincter, and adjacent to the external rectal sphincter. As the anal
canal balloon is inflated, polygraph tracings show contraction of the
internal and external rectal sphincters. Training is designed to teach
the patient to contract the external rectal sphincter (preventing leakage
of feces) when the anal canal balloon expands, activating rectal wall
stretch receptors.
Adjunctive training procedures used in addition to biofeedback include
bowel or habit training, dietary counseling, medication, home program
including logs (normal bowel movements and incontinence episodes), and
daily sphincter control exercises.
Biofeedback has been effective in children diagnosed with fecal
incontinence and encopresis (constipation), and in adults with chronic
fecal incontinence and incontinence due to obstetric complications, and
constipation. Several researchers have shown that patients maintain
continence at long-term follow-up. Biofeedback does not correct
incontinence caused by surgery to correct rectal prolapse.
Evidence-Based Practice in
Biofeedback and Neurofeedback (2004) rates biofeedback
for fecal elimination disorders at level 3 efficacy, probably efficacious.
The criteria for level 3 efficacy include "Multiple observational
studies, clinical studies, wait list controlled studies, and within
subject and intrasubject replication studies that demonstrate efficacy"
(pp. 19-21). This rating was assigned due to the heterogeneous patient
populations studied and the absence of control groups.
Whitehead and Drossman (1996) concluded that when pelvic nerve injuries impair anal sphincter
contraction or sensory feedback from stretch receptors in the rectal
wall, biofeedback can eliminate or reduce the frequency of incontinence
by 90% for about 72% of patients. Most gastroenterologists consider
biofeedback the treatment of choice in these cases. Biofeedback is also
preferred for treating constipation due to a patient’s inability to relax
pelvic floor muscles during elimination. Biofeedback also shows promise
for treating rectal pain due to excessive pelvic floor muscle
contraction.
Heymen, Jones, Ringel, Scarlett, and Whitehead
(2001) estimated that biofeedback for fecal incontinence
achieves a 67-74% success rate. They criticized the experimental design
of several of the studies they reviewed.
Seymour (2002) concluded that the
effectiveness of fecal incontinence biofeedback has been demonstrated for
neurogenic and idiopathic anal incontinence, and incontinence related to
disruption of anal sphincters. Fecal incontinence biofeedback reduced
incontinence episodes 90% in more than 60% of patients. Electrical
stimulation of the anal sphincter combined with biofeedback may result in
greater symptom and pressure improvement than biofeedback alone.
Mahony and colleagues (2004) randomly assigned 60 symptomatic women diagnosed with postpartum fecal
incontinence to 12 weekly sessions of intra-anal electromyographic
biofeedback alone or combined with electrical stimulation of the anal
sphincter. They also assigned these patients daily pelvic floor
exercises. Fifty-four women completed treatment. Both groups achieved
improved continence scores and squeeze anal pressures, while resting
anal pressures did not change. Patients in both groups also reported
improved quality of life. The addition of electrical stimulation did not
improve therapeutic outcome.
Urinary incontinence is the
involuntary loss of urine. This problem affects approximately 13 million
Americans, mainly women. Three common types of incontinence are urge
incontinence, stress incontinence, and mixed incontinence.
Urge incontinence involves
involuntarily emptying the entire bladder and is produced by
detrusor
muscle overactivity due to detrusor myopathy (abnormal muscle condition),
neuropathy (nerve damage), and both myopathy and neuropathy.
Stress incontinence is the
involuntary loss of a variable amount of urine when intra-abdominal
pressure increases. The problem in stress incontinence is the failure of
the urethral sphincters to resist urinary flow. Possible stress
incontinence causes include excessive urethral movement due to
insufficient pelvic floor support and intrinsic sphincter deficiency.
Mixed incontinence is the involuntary
loss of urine that results from stress and urge incontinence. The
detrusor is overactive and the urinary sphincters are weak (Choe, 2002;
Geurrero & Sinert, 2002; O'Shaughnessy, 2006).
About 13 million Americans may experience urinary incontinence. The prevalence of this disorder may range from 10-25% in females 15-64, and 1.5-5% in males (O'Shaughnessy, 2006).
The urinary bladder is located in the
pelvic cavity. The bladder wall consists of three coats. The intermediate
coat is the detrusor muscle, which is
composed of three smooth muscle layers. The movement of urine from the
urinary bladder to the urethral orifice is controlled by the involuntary
internal urethral sphincter (smooth
muscle) and voluntary external urethral
sphincter (skeletal muscle).
Micturition (urine discharge) is
produced by contraction of involuntary and voluntary muscles coordinated
by the micturition center in spinal cord segments S2 and S3. When bladder
volume exceeds 200-400 ml, the micturition
center triggers the micturition
reflex.
During the micturition reflex, the micturition center signals the
detrusor muscle to contract and the internal urethral sphincter to relax,
and blocks contraction of the external urethral sphincter, causing it to
relax.
During early childhood, we learn to initiate or delay urination by
learning to control the external urethral sphincter and pelvic floor
muscles. (Choe, 2002; Geurrero & Sinert, 2002; O'Shaughnessy, 2002).
Clinicians use three strategies to treat urinary incontinence: reducing
detrusor overactivity by monitoring the bladder using an inserted
catheter, increasing the strength of pelvic floor muscles using SEMG
sensors (vaginal or anal) or pressure sensors, and combining the previous
methods while minimizing intra-abdominal pressure increases monitored by
a rectal balloon (multimeasurement method).
Tries and Brubaker (1996) recommended
the multimeasurement method because it reinforces “a more discriminate
pelvic floor contraction” than single channel methods. The
multimeasurement method achieved superior reductions in incontinence
episodes from 75.9-82% in about 5 sessions, compared with 43-61%
reductions with single-channel biofeedback in an average of 11 sessions.
Biofeedback training sessions use devices like the Thought Technology
Ltd. MyoTrac 3 Continence Trainer and continence software, which displays
pelvic floor and accessory muscle SEMG activity.
Biofeedback training in the clinic is supplemented by a home program that
includes symptoms logs and pelvic muscle training exercises using devices
like the Thought Technology Ltd. U-Control home continence trainer shown
above.
Evidence-Based Practice in
Biofeedback and Neurofeedback (2004) rates biofeedback
for urinary incontinence in females at level 5 efficacy, efficacious
and specific. Level 5 efficacy means: "The investigational treatment
has been shown to be statistically superior to credible sham therapy,
pill, or alternative bona fide treatment in at least two independent
research settings" (p. 35).
Researchers have found that biofeedback for urinary incontinence in
females is superior to no treatment, comparable or superior to
alternative behavioral treatments like pelvic floor exercises, and
superior to drugs like oxybutynin chloride, regardless of patient age. A
stepped program that combines drug and behavioral treatments may be
superior to an individual treatment.
Evidence-Based Practice in
Biofeedback and Neurofeedback (2004) rates biofeedback for
urinary incontinence in males at level 4 efficacy, efficacious. The
criteria for level 4 efficacy include:"
Van Kampen et al. (2000) reported
that biofeedback for urinary incontinence following prostatectomy was
superior to a no-treatment control. Floratos et
al. (2002) showed that biofeedback for urinary incontinence
was equivalent to pelvic floor exercises.
Evidence-Based Practice in
Biofeedback and Neurofeedback (2004) rates biofeedback
for urinary incontinence in children at level 2 efficacy, possibly efficacious.
The criteria for level 2 efficacy include "At least one study of
sufficient statistical power with well identified outcome measures, but
lacking randomized assignment to a control condition internal to the
study" (pp. 36-37). A level 2 rating was awarded due to lack of
randomized clinical trials.
While studies of biofeedback continence training for children lack
randomized assignment to experimental and control conditions, three
studies showed improved continence in 80-90% of participants (Combs,
Glassberg, Gerdes, & Horowitz, 1998; Hoekx, Wyndaele, & Vermandel, 1998;
McKenna, Herndon, Connery, & Ferrer, 1999).
After removal of meniscus cartilage in the knee, a
postmeniscectomy
patient experiences weakness in the muscles that act on the leg. A
knee
joint is shown below with cartilage and tendons.
Acute meniscal tears are diagnosed in 61 of 100,000 persons in the United States. Males outnumber females 2.5 to 1. Meniscal injury shows the highest incidence in males 31-40 and females 11-20. The rate of this problem is 60% in patients above the age of 65 (Baker, 2004).
SEMG electrodes may be placed over the quadriceps femoris to assist
practice of isometric or isotonic contractions to increase muscle
strength. Initial electrode spacing should be wide due to weak muscle
output and then narrowed to reduce crosstalk from co-contracting
hamstring muscles.
The vastus lateralis and vastus medialis
obliquus muscles are shown below on the left diagram above the knee.
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) treats knee pain, deformity, and instability due to degeneration or inflammation by replacing the knee with a prosthesis. Pain due to severe arthritis is the primary indication for this procedure. Physical therapy is initiated soon after surgery and involves exercises which may be complemented by use of a continuous passive motion (CPM) device. Patients must usually achieve 90 degree knee flexion before discharge (Palmer & Cross, 2004).
Approximately 130,000 total knee replacement operations are annually performed in the United States. While osteoarthritic degeneration of the knee is seen in the radiographs of 40% of 40-year-olds, only half of these individuals are symptomatic (Palmer & Cross, 2004).
Kuiken, Amir, and Scheidt (2004) studied 14 asymptomatic controls and 11 patients following
total knee arthroplasty (TKA), in
which the knee joint was surgically replaced. A
computerized biofeedback knee joint goniometer (CBG)
provides patients and physicians with audiovisual feedback about knee
joint angle. This information is crucial in retraining TKA patients to
achieve a normal range-of-motion (ROM). The authors reported that
CBG-angle measurements were highly correlated with manual clinician
measurements between 0° and 100°. Most patients showed good acceptance
of CBG. Auditory feedback motivated exercise more than visual feedback.
There was slightly more ROM activity on days that that the device
silently monitored patients than on the audiovisual feedback days.
Muscle-tendon transfer is a procedure that repositions a tendon so that
an attached muscle can be reoriented and produce a new movement. This
operation is used when there is permanent muscle injury or paralysis and is designed to replace or reconstruct a missing motor function (Higgs & Baumeister, 2005).
SEMG
biofeedback is used to increase motor unit recruitment in re-educated
muscles and reduce interference from antagonist muscles. Where SEMG measurements do not correspond to a change in position, as when
the recording surface (wrist) is too small for electrodes or the muscle
lies too deeply, positional feedback may be superior. For example, an
electrogoniometer (shown below) places a potentiometer over two bones
that form a joint and displays joint angle changes as changes in voltage.
Now that you have completed this module, locate the muscles discussed
above in a muscle atlas.
Consider where two-channel SEMG assessment is indicated and why.
Baker, B. S. (2004). Meniscus injuries. eMedicine.
Basmajian, J. V. (Ed.). (1989). Biofeedback: Principles and practice for
clinicians. New York: Williams & Wilkins.
Choe, J. M. (2002). Incontinence, urinary: Surgical therapies.
eMedicine.
Combs, A. J., Glassberg, A. D., Gerdes, D., & Horowitz, M. (1998).
Biofeedback therapy for children with dysfunctional voiding. Urology,
52(2), 312-315.
Cram, J. R., & associates (1990). Clinical EMG for surface recordings:
Volume 2. Nevada City, CA: Clinical Resources.
Floratos, D. L., Sonke, G. S., Rapidou, C. A., Alivizatos, G. J.,
Deliveliotis, C., Constantinides, C. A., et al. (2002). Biofeedback vs.
verbal feedback as learning tools for pelvic muscle exercises in the
early management of urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy.
British Journal of Urology, International, 89(7), 714-719.
Geurrero, P., & Sinert, R. (2002). Urinary incontinence. eMedicine.
Gevirtz, R. (2003). The mind/muscle connection: A search for
psychophysiological mechanisms of chronic muscle pain. Special
Address
presented at the 34th AAPB annual convention at Jacksonville, Florida.
Hartje, J. (1997). Biofeedback: Basic neuromuscular intervention
(module 3). Wheat Ridge: AAPB.
Heymen, S., Jones, K. R., Ringel, Y., Scarlett, Y., & Whitehead, W. E.
(2001). Biofeedback treatment of fecal incontinence: A critical review. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, 44(5), 728-736.
Higgs, P. E., & Baumeister, S. (2005). Hand, tendon transfers. eMedicine.
Hoekx, L., Wyndaele, J. J., & Vermandel, A. (1998). The role of bladder
biofeedback in the treatment of children with refractory nocturnal
enuresis associated with idiopathic detrusor instability and small
bladder capacity. Journal of Urology, 160 (3 pt 1), 858-860.
Kuiken, T. A., Amir, H., & Scheidt, R. A. (2004). Computerized
biofeedback knee goniometer: acceptance and effect on exercise behavior
in post-total knee arthroplasty rehabilitation. Archives of Physical
Medicine Rehabilitation, 85(6), 1026-1030.
McKenna, P. H., Herndon, C. D., Connery, S., & Ferrer, F. A. (1999).
Pelvic floor muscle retraining for pediatric voiding dysfunction using
interactive computer games. Journal of Urology, 162(3 pt 2),
1056-1063.
Mahony, R. T., Malone, P. A., Nalty, J., Behan, M., O'Connell, P.
R., & O'Herlihy, C. (2004). Randomized clinical trial of intra-anal
electromyographic biofeedback physiotherapy with intra-anal
electromyographic biofeedback augmented with electrical stimulation of
the anal sphincter in the early treatment of postpartum fecal
incontinence. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 191(3),
885-890.
Nelson, R., Norton, N., Cautley, E., & Furner, S. (1995). Community-based prevalence of anal incontinence. JAMA, 274(7), 559-561.
O'Shaughnessy, M. (2006). Incontinence, urinary: Comprehensive review of
medical and surgical aspects. eMedicine.
Palmer, S. H., & Cross, M. J. (2004). Total knee athroplasty. eMedicine.
Saulny, S. S. (2005). Blepharospasm, benign essential. eMedicine.
M. S.
Schwartz, & F. Andrasik (Eds.). (2003). Biofeedback: A practitioner's guide
(3rd ed.).
New
York: The Guilford Press.
Seymour, S. D. (2002). Fecal incontinence. eMedicine.
Tortora, G. J., & Derrickson, B. H. (2006). Principles of anatomy and physiology (11th ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Tries, J., & Brubaker, L. (1996). Application of biofeedback in the
treatment of urinary incontinence. Professional Psychology: Research
and Practice, 27(6), 554-560.
Tries, J., Eisman, E., & Lowery, S. P. (1995). Fecal incontinence. In M.
S.
Schwartz (Ed.). (1995). Biofeedback: A practitioner's guide.
New
York: The Guilford Press.
Van Kampen, M. De Weerdt, W., Van Poppel, H., De Ridder, D., Feys, H., &
Baert, L. (2000). Effect of pelvic floor re-education on duration and
degree of incontinence after radical prostatectomy: A randomized
controlled trial. Lancet, 355(9198), 98-102.
Whitehead, W. E., & Drossman, D. A. (1996). Biofeedback for disorders of
elimination: Fecal incontinence and pelvic floor dyssynergia.
Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 27(3), 234-240.
Yucha, C. B., & Gilbert, C. D. (2004). Evidence-based practice in
biofeedback and neurofeedback. Wheat Ridge: AAPB.